offline
(18.07.2023, 19:51)saphir schrieb: ---
Die Boykotte sind nach meiner Meinung völlig zurecht. Wir sind sehr offen zu China. Wir können aber auch nicht jede ökonomische Vernunft beiseite schieben, wir sind auch Wettbewerber. China muss sich bewegen.
Das waere ein bisschen eine einseitige Sicht der Dinge.
Es gab ja z.B. das CAI-Agreement zwischen der EU und China welches einige der Themen beinhaltete.
Das Abkommen wurde dann faszinierender Weise nach Jahren der Verhandlungen letzten Endes von der EU im Ratifizierungsprozess aufs Abstellgleis geschoben.
Vermutlich gabs da einen Anruf von der anderen Seite des Teiches und die EU wurde daran erinnert wer die Leine haelt
Geopolitik halt
Zitat:Is the EU-China Investment Agreement Dead?
---
The EU-China investment agreement has undergone a rocky journey since negotiations concluded in December 2020. At the time, members of both the outgoing Trump and incoming Biden administrations in the United States criticized the deal, arguing that it did not sufficiently address China’s use of forced labor, among other issues. Ratification of the agreement unraveled shortly afterward...
....
Before, many observers pointed to the agreement as a win for Beijing that would secure continued EU investment in China and thwart Washington’s efforts to block Beijing from the global trade regime. Back in 2020, Chinese President Xi Jinping personally intervened at the last minute to offer concessions over market access and save the deal, highlighting its importance to the Chinese government. Xi praised the pact as nurturing a “brighter future for cooperation” with Europe. The EU described the deal as “the most ambitious agreement that China has ever concluded with a third country,” lauding its comprehensive rules against forced technology transfer and requirements for increased transparency on subsidy and sustainability commitments. Now, such rhetoric seems like platitudes from a bygone era....
...
*https://thediplomat.com
